 |








 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
We'll start with my own stupidity, I think, because it's appropriate. Folks, if you've been getting spam emails from my aol.com account, yes, it was apparently hacked. Best guess is that someone sniffed my credentials while I was attending Black Hat last week. I understand the dangers and thought I was being careful, but I must have exposed my password at some point, probably when a session cookie didn't get properly cleared. I detected the problem almost immediately when the first burst of emails was sent from my account on Friday, and changed my password. That seems to have stopped the immediate problem, although the hackers will still have my contacts list and my address to spoof on the From line of the emails, so you may see some more mail until they wander off to annoy someone else. No sign that they've broken any of my other credentials, but I'm changing all my other passwords in advance of the usual schedule just in case, and I'll be watching for other signs of trouble. Now for the other stupidity that's more amusing. I don't usually respond to the Writer's Block items, but on an impulse I did yesterday (the posting is here if you're curious). Afterward I got a private message from someone who said that they had "read my profile" and "become interested," and invited me to open private communications. Lots of hints at a romantic outcome. Clearly just bait for some kind of scam, although it seems like an overly elaborate method for just harvesting email addresses. The stupidity, of course, comes from the claim to have "read my profile." Right. Had you done so, the first words that would have jumped out at you were "husband" and "father." Either the context checker wasn't very good, or the scammer wasn't even bothering . . . Recently I read Charles Stross' Rule 34, which is in large part about spam as a tool for organized crime. One element of the plot is the revelation that emergent AI has appeared on the net, as a result of an arms race between systems designed to generate plausible spam, and systems designed to distinguish between spam and legitimate traffic. I found that a very depressing idea . . . not least because it's remarkably plausible. Tags: internet, social commentary Current Mood: annoyed
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


|
 |
|
 |